The Paul Chapman decision

By Jake Niall
Updated April 9 2014 - 12:18pm, first published April 8 2014 - 8:08pm
The queue of suitors for Paul Chapman wasn't that extensive, in part because of his age and injury record. Photo: Pat Scala
The queue of suitors for Paul Chapman wasn't that extensive, in part because of his age and injury record. Photo: Pat Scala

Essendon's decision to recruit Paul Chapman involved little agonising. He cost the Bombers zilch in the draft, and his two-year contract contained a protection for the club:  Chapman had to play a certain number of games to receive that second season.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Taree news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.