GREATER Taree City Council has acknowledged a lack of confidence that coal seam gas developments can be undertaken without causing unacceptable impacts on the local community and the environment.
This was part of a position statement adopted by the council at its December ordinary meeting.
The statement says current and future coal seam gas approvals should not be allowed to proceed in the area until the environmental risks, as well as social and economic impacts, have been rigorously assessed and publicly reported at a local and regional level.
"Under the current system each coal seam gas development is considered separately. There is a need to introduce measures to address the cumulative impacts of coal seam gas projects at regional scales," the statement says.
"In particular, the cumulative impact on groundwater and surface water, resulting from multiple mining and coal seam gas developments, should be considered during the decision making process."
It adds there is an urgent need to pause on new coal seam gas developments and allow sufficient resources and time for upfront strategic planning on a regional scale.
"An effective and well resourced strategic land use planning process has to be established across the state specifically in regard to coal seam gas industry development.
"It has to identify competing land uses, existing industry needs, environmental values and social needs as well as identify coal seam gas exclusion zones where appropriate."
The statement says the planning process would enable the proper consideration of the cumulative impacts on a regional scale.
"The planning process must incorporate fair and effective community participation provisions.
"Future coal seam gas developments and exploration proposals within our region need to be assessed within the context of such a plan."
The council's position is based on a joint statement developed by MidCoast Water's sustainable water cycle management committee.
It has sought adoption of the statement by member councils, including Greater Taree along with Great Lakes and Gloucester.
It was noted at the meeting this was only a position statement - not council policy - and could be altered if required, but was seen as a way forward and a method of flagging to the government the concerns of the people of the Manning Valley.