News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Pokies pre-commitment would cost jobs, CEO warns 

Pokies pre-commitment would cost jobs, CEO warns

19 Apr, 2011 09:38 AM
“OUR 92 staff would be out of work if mandatory pre-commitment regulations relating to poker machines comes into effect,” CEO of Club Taree Geoff Garnett warned Sunday’s annual general meeting of Taree RSL and Golf Club.

The club and pub industry’s bitter fight against the government’s so called anti-gambling proposals was at the centre of lengthy discussion at the meeting, Mr Garnett painting a sobering picture of what might happen if commonsense does not prevail.

Pre-commitment provides a restriction on gaming machine expenditure to prevent players spending more money than they originally intended. This is achieved by fixing a maximum limit on losses before the commencement of play.

The government argues that those gamblers who find it hard to stop playing gaming machines once they start would benefit if they fixed the maximum amount of money they were willing to lose. Once they reached their nominated limit, they would have to stop gambling (or receive a warning that the limit had been reached).

Before playing a gaming machine, the player would have to apply for a card, similar to a loyalty card, which would be programmed with the player’s identifying information and the player would nominate their maximum daily/weekly spending limit. A player would only be allowed one card, which would be needed to play any machine in the State.

The cost to the Manning community from Club Taree’s loss of turnover alone would be a loss of $3 million a year plus flow-on effects, Mr Garnett said on Sunday.

“Other clubs and pubs would be affected as well, and this in turn would flow on to all the local organisations, businesses and sporting bodies who rely on us.

“The fight continues, and we will fight to the end,” Mr Garnett said.

“At the end of the day, if this legislation gets up, there won’t be a lot of clubs and pubs left, and there won’t be much sport played in the Manning area, because so many of our sporting clubs rely on the support of licensed premises.

“Junior and senior sporting teams will be the hardest hit, but also we would see the withdrawal of facilities like swimming pools, golf courses and gymnasiums, all provided by licensed premises.

“There are a host of issues which I don’t believe have been examined.

“It’s being said that clubs receive a lot of revenue from poker machines and don’t give back to the community. But what is not being recognised is the fact that so many club assets are owned by the community.”

Mr Garnett said he was still personally at a loss to understand “how this licence to gamble, or to punt, or whatever they want to call it, will help the problem gambler.”

“What problem gamblers need is help, by way of treatment,” he said.

“I think people need to look at what this is all about.

“They won’t, for example, be able to come to a licensed premises and withdraw $200 from their own account.

“Particularly in smaller communities licensed premises act as a de facto town hall, and as a de facto bank, as well as a major supporter of schools and sporting facilities, and all these services would be withdrawn if this proposal goes ahead.

“Additionally, in our case, our Meals on Wheels service for the people of the Manning would have to go.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This report inaccurately describes the consumer protection reforms recommended by the Productivity Commission (and adopted by the federal government) after 11 years of study and full consultation with the pokie club industry.

It omits to describe the ability for recreational gamblers to gamble outside the system. To describe or even imply that the reforms are "mandatory" is wrong.

Further, Mr Garnett offers no basis for his speculations. This is scare mongering at it's worst.

Posted by Paul Bendat, 19/04/2011 4:17:30 PM, on Manning River Times
Let me see if I've got it right. The proposed system won't help problem gamblers spend less but it will still result in a profit drop of at least $3 million because non-problem players will not be able to spend more than they planned. Wow! I didn't realise that so many people in Manning spent more than they planned to at the pokies! Perhaps Geoff Garnett might want to rethink his argument against the reforms. I am sure neither he nor the clubs he speaks about don't want it known how much they rely on poker machine players overspending!
Posted by Sue Pinkerton, 20/04/2011 2:47:25 AM, on Manning River Times

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Manning River Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...